College sports used to be about development, watching players grow through the program, build chemistry with teammates, and represent their school with pride. Now, with the rise of the transfer portal and Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, that’s starting to change. What once felt like a unique part of college athletics is starting to look a lot more like professional free agency.
The transfer portal was originally meant to give athletes more freedom. Before it existed, players who wanted to transfer often had to sit out a year or go through a messy process. The new system made it easier and fairer for athletes to move if they weren’t happy. But when NIL money entered the picture, things took a sharp turn. Now, the best players aren’t transferring for playing time; instead, they’re transferring for the biggest paycheck.
Graphic by Jaxon Sturgeon.
Top programs can now essentially “buy” players by offering them huge NIL deals. Big schools with massive fan bases and booster support have the money to make these offers. Small programs, on the other hand, can’t compete financially. A player might spend two years developing at a smaller school, then leave for a powerhouse program that can offer more exposure and a better NIL deal. It’s frustrating for coaches who invest time into developing talent, only to lose that talent once the player becomes valuable.
Because of this, college recruiting has started to feel more like pro free agency. Coaches aren’t just trying to recruit high school players anymore; they’re constantly re-recruiting their own athletes, hoping they won’t jump ship. Players, too, are learning to treat college as a business, weighing offers and sponsorships like professional athletes. While that might sound fair on the surface, after all, they deserve to profit from their talent, it also strips away some of what made college sports special: loyalty, team growth, and long term development.
In the end, the combination of the transfer portal and NIL has made college sports more about money than development. While it’s great that athletes finally have more control over their careers, it’s hard not to feel like the spirit of college athletics is being lost along the way.
If things keep heading in this direction, it’s going to start feeling less like college sports and more like the pros.
Every year, we get told that college is the key to success. Teachers, parents, and counselors repeat the message like a mantra: “Work hard, get good grades, get into the best college you can.” But few talk about the price of that advice, not just the tens of thousands of dollars many families can’t afford, but also the toll it takes on students’ mental health and sense of purpose.
Today, the path to higher education has become an issue that teens can’t afford to ignore. College costs have climbed faster than inflation for decades. According to the College Board’s 2024 Trends in College Pricing Report, the average annual cost (including tuition, housing, and fees) is about $28,840 for public universities and $57,570 for private colleges. That means a single four-year degree can easily exceed $100,000. Meanwhile, the total U.S. student loan debt has reached $1.8 trillion.
The result is a generation that feels trapped in anxiety. We are told that college is essential to success, yet the financial reality makes it nearly impossible to pursue it without incurring debt. This system pressures us to make life-altering decisions before graduating from high school, often without a clear understanding of the financial implications of debt.
Even worse, the cultural obsession with “the perfect college” has turned education into a competition rather than an opportunity for growth. A 2024 Pew Research Center survey found that seven in ten teenagers feel stressed about their future education or career plans. The American Psychological Association reports that constant academic pressure is now one of the leading sources of teen anxiety and burnout. When students feel their worth depends on getting into a top school, learning becomes secondary to surviving the system.
Graphic by Chloe Newton.
This issue goes beyond money- it’s about values. Society has built a narrative that college is the only path to success, when, in reality, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that many skilled trade jobs, such as those in electrician and technician roles, or healthcare assistant positions, are growing faster than the national average and often require less than a four-year college degree. If this trend continues, we risk creating a future where only the wealthy can afford education without hardship. That’s not opportunity – that’s inequality. It’s time to rethink how we define success for teens and how schools prepare us for life after graduation.
To move forward, we need action on several levels. Schools should provide transparent financial education, showing the real college costs, interest rates, and repayment timelines before students apply. Counselors should present multiple paths —trade programs, community college, or apprenticeships—without treating them as “less than.” Lawmakers must invest in making public education more affordable, expanding Pell Grants, and capping interest rates on student loans. Students can speak out by writing, organizing awareness campaigns, or advocating for school boards to include financial literacy in their graduation requirements.
Redefining success doesn’t mean giving up ambition but making it sustainable. The dream of college shouldn’t come with a lifetime of debt or exhaustion before adulthood even begins.
Education is supposed to open doors, not lock students into decades of repayment and pressure. Until we fix the system, the actual cost of college won’t be just financial- it will be the mental and emotional price our generation pays for chasing an idea of success that no longer fits our world.
As a kid, I’ve always loved turtles, the way they swam, their shells, and just how they looked in general.
But, there is one main reason I love them so much.
When I was little, I would go over to my mom’s aunt’s house. She had a ton of little knick knacks, and little turtles that were made out of seashells were one of them. I always loved going to her house and looking at them, I was always careful to not break anything no matter what.
The turtles were always my favorite, though, because I thought it was cool how people made an animal out of tiny shells from the beach.
I was only around four and most people may not think I remember, but I will always remember seeing those turtles. Even though my mom’s aunt is not with us anymore, that will always be one of my favorite memories from when I was little.
But these sea creatures are far more important than a childhood memory.
From the tiniest plankton to the biggest whale, ocean animals struggle to live a lot more than we think they do. The reason? Ocean pollution.
Graphic information by Jilliann Denbo.
We may not understand the effects of ocean pollution but we are running out of time to help these ocean creatures. We have to put a stop to unwanted pollution.
We can start to change ocean pollution by recycling properly, avoid products containing microbeads, and participate in a beach or river cleanup.
All these actions can help us change our home and our health. But most importantly, the animals’ health.
Ocean animals suffer because we don’t think enough about our actions and we don’t think that it actually affects the oceans.
Unlike most ocean animals, turtles and whales get affected by ocean pollution a little more than the rest of the animals.
Because of pollution sea turtles ingest too much plastic, causing them to be unable to dive properly to get the food they need. Over 260 loggerhead sea turtles are suffering because of plastic pollution in the ocean.
Whales often mistake plastic for prey, this leads to their stomach being stopped up, which then leads to a slow and painful starvation.
Once the vibrant ocean, full of life and wonder, now covered in plastic with suffering animals, and what feels like cold waters. The ocean now looks like a graveyard. We have to stop this pollution.
I grew up on a farm surrounded by wide-open fields, dirt roads, and the sound of animals waking me up in the morning. Life felt simple there. I had my mom, my dad, my brother, and my dad’s side of the family all around me.
Most days were spent running the gator through the grass, feeding animals, or climbing trees. I remember the smell of hay in the barn, the rumble of tractors, and the way the sky glowed orange when the sun set behind the fields. At night, the stars looked close enough to touch, and the only sounds were crickets singing and the distant call of an owl.
That farm wasn’t just where I lived, it was my world. That farm felt like home, and I thought it always would be.
But one day, everything changed. My grandmother came and picked me up from the bus stop of my long rocky road from the farm and told me I was moving away from the farm. At first, I didn’t understand what it meant. Packing up my room felt strange, I was putting pieces of my childhood into boxes, not realizing I wouldn’t see that place again. I held onto little things like my favorite toy tractor, a picture of me with my dad by the barn and placed them carefully into boxes. It felt like I was putting pieces of my childhood away.
When the moving day finally came, I climbed into the car and pressed my face to the window. As we drove away, I watched the fields, the barn, and the trees getting smaller and smaller until they were gone. The farther we went, the smaller everything looked, until it was completely gone. I felt like a part of me was left behind.
Moving to the city was like stepping into another world. The first thing I noticed was the noise. Instead of birds and cows, I heard cars honking, people shouting, and sirens in the distance. The air didn’t smell fresh anymore, it smelled like pavement after rain, exhaust from cars, and food from restaurants we passed. The houses seemed squished together, side by side, with tiny yards that felt nothing like the acres of space I used to have. Even at night, the city wasn’t quiet. Lights from street lamps and buildings replaced the stars, and I missed looking up at the sky and seeing nothing but constellations.
Adjusting to life in the city was hard. I had grown up with so much space to run, but here I had to stay on sidewalks or in crowded parks. People dressed differently, talked differently, and even moved faster. I felt out of place, like a farm kid dropped into a world I didn’t belong to. My mom tried to make the new house feel like home, but I could feel the change in her too. My parents had split custody, and suddenly, my life felt divided.
For a while, I still saw my dad, but then one day, I didn’t anymore. At first, I thought it was temporary, that maybe he was just busy and would come around again. I kept waiting for the phone to ring or for him to show up. But weeks turned into months, and months turned into years, and he never did. Losing the farm was hard, but losing him was harder. It was confusing, painful, and something I didn’t know how to explain. I carried questions that never really had answers.
As time went on, I had to learn how to adjust. I had to learn the “city way” of living, walking down busy sidewalks, getting used to neighbors being so close, and not hearing crickets at night. I learned how to cross busy streets, how to sleep even when the city never seemed quiet, and how to find little comforts in a place that felt so different from what I knew. It wasn’t easy, but slowly, I figured out how to fit in. Over time, the sidewalks didn’t feel so strange, and I started making memories in the city too. The farm kid inside me still missed the country, but I learned to find pieces of comfort in my new life. But even as I adjusted, a part of me still missed the smell of fresh cut grass, the silence of the country, and the closeness of family on the farm.
Looking back, moving away from the farm was more than just changing houses. It was the moment everything shifted, my family, my home, and even the way I saw the world. It was painful, but it also taught me something important: how to adapt and be stronger, even when life feels unfair or doesn’t go the way you expect.
The city may never feel exactly like the farm, but it became part of who I am, and so did the lessons I learned along the way.
In June, New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic Primary for this fall’s NYC mayoral election. Mamdani’s win was attributed to a late-stage surge in popularity among young and liberal voters who felt disenfranchised by the establishment Democratic candidate, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo.
Mamdani, a self-described socialist, has attracted controversy for his political views and his Muslim faith. “Old Guard Democrats” – the more moderate, older, and establishment members of the party – have generally stayed silent on or criticized Mamdani.
Mamdani is widely regarded as the favorite and a shoo-in come November. Embattled incumbent Eric Adams mounted an independent re-election campaign after forgoing the Democratic Primary, which would have ensured his defeat; however, Adams dropped out of the election on September 28th. Mamdani is facing former primary opponent Cuomo and the Republican nominee, Curtis Sliwa.
In my opinion, Mamdani will win, and I think he’ll do good things for the city, but I don’t believe his socialist approach to running the largest city in the United States is the best one. I do think New York would be better served by a more traditional, moderate-liberal candidate, not a socialist akin to Senator Bernie Sanders or Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Most of Mamdani’s campaign is based around lowering the cost of living in the city; his approaches include freezing rent in the city; fare free busses; the new department of community safety; no cost childcare; city-owned grocery stores; triple the city’s production of permanently affordable, union-built, rent-stabilized homes; cracking down on bad landlords; and higher taxes on corporations and the richest New Yorkers to pay for his programs.
These are good programs, no doubt, that I mostly agree with. Freezing rent in the city is probably one of his best ideas. A majority of New Yorkers are tenants, and more than two million of them live in rent-stabilized apartments. Adams has taken every opportunity to squeeze tenants, with his hand-picked appointees to the Rent Guidelines Board jacking up rents on stabilized apartments by 9% (and counting ) – the most since a Republican Mayoral Administration.
Mamdani plans to immediately freeze the rent for all stabilized tenants and use “every available resource” to build the housing New Yorkers need and reduce the rent. However, I do believe his promise of city-owned grocery stores, while a good idea for easing financial burden, is unrealistic and too idealistic.
Cuomo’s plans to improve affordability include increasing the supply of affordable housing, expanding access to affordable healthcare, guaranteeing universal 3-K, increasing childcare options, making transportation more affordable by expanding discounted access to buses, and significantly increasing the percentage of New Yorkers who enroll in the subsidized Fair Fares programs for which they are eligible. provide targeted tax relief to lower-income and middle-class voters, including homeowners, worker protections, and via tax-cutting measures.
Forgotten and certain to lose, the Republican Nominee for Mayor, Curtis Sliwa, the founder of the Guardian Angels, was previously the 2021 Republican Nominee, losing to Adams. Sliwa plans to utilize vacant New York City Housing Authority apartments, pointing to thousands of vacant apartments within the NYCHA system as an untapped resource for addressing the city’s housing needs.
A better candidate, such as the current and former Congressman for New York’s 3rd Congressional District, Tom Suozzi, a pragmatic moderate, did not run in the Mayoral Primary. Suozzi has criticized Mamdani and Ocasio-Cortez. Suozzi has said that “every” Democratic socialist should leave the Democratic Party and form their own party. He expressed his wish that Mamdani lose the general election since it would “be bad for the Democratic Party” if he won. Suozzi has also voiced his wish for the Democratic Party to work with the Trump Administration.
Cuomo is too embattled and unpopular, resigning in disgrace from the governor’s office in 2021 after 14 accusations of sexual harassment, and the controversial matter of his understating the toll of COVID-19-related deaths in state nursing homes by as much as 50 percent while governor. For this, he is currently being investigated by the United States Department of Justice.
While Cuomo is certainly the most qualified candidate for Mayor, Mamdani is the most popular and the most likely victor. New York City’s politics, leaders, and politicians have attracted considerable criticism in the last four years, during former President Joe Biden’s term and the previous years of Mayor Adams’ term. Adams has proven a corrupt, self-serving, lying criminal idiot without a backbone and is arguably the worst mayor in New York City history.
On Sept. 3, it was revealed that the Trump Administration had reportedly talked to the Adams Campaign about offering the mayor a position in the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or as the Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, if Adams agreed to drop out, so Cuomo stands a better chance of defeating Mamdani in the election. Adams, however, denied this and refused to drop out of the election on Sept. 6. However, with his ever-flip-flopping nature as evident as ever, Adams finally dropped out on Sunday, Sept. 28.
The 2025 New York City mayoral election is simultaneously the most controversial and potentially corrupt election of the year, and the most clear-cut in terms of who will ultimately emerge victorious. Zohran Kwame Mamdani, a 33-year-old socialist, a Ugandan-born Muslim immigrant, will become the 111th Mayor of New York City on Jan. 1, 2026.
And for this, New York City will receive what I believe will be effective, boots on the ground, support for the 8 million that inhabit the five boroughs. Mamdani may not be the most ideal or perfect candidate, but with the choices we have, in light of the past, Mamdani is the best choice for Mayor of New York City
In our country, we’ve come to know the news as a cycle of proliferating madness. It can make the most minuscule events seem like the end of the world, and the most dangerous of people seem like strong leaders. Lately, there’s one man that media across the board seem to be going after. Fox News, The New York Times, and The Atlantic, just to name a few, have taken aim at state assemblyman and mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani.
The Democratic Socialist seemingly emerged from nowhere with a strong base of support and the rhetoric to stand against the other Democratic nominees in the New York City mayoral primaries. This is where he first started making waves for those outside of the city. Mamdani stood on stage and grilled Andrew Cuomo on a plethora of issues that plagued the former governor’s reign.
Cuomo’s stint in office was fraught with controversy. From sexual harassment allegations to hospital overcrowding during COVID to misappropriation of city funds for his own personal use, it’s a surprise he even had the courage to run again. In the Democratic primaries, Mamdani was the hardest on Cuomo, calling him out for many of the issues that arise with the idea of another term. It’s this type of aggressive rhetoric that we must show to politicians who have failed us. We can’t settle for corruption to fight corruption.
One of the biggest issues that arose in the primary debate was that of Israel. In the most viral moment of the debate, the candidates were asked where they would go on their first trip outside of the city. Mamdani was the only person to insist he’d remain in New York, while almost every other candidate answered Israel, as well as Canada and the Caribbean.
This may be one of the most pivotal moments in American history regarding our relationship to Israel and the ongoing genocide, especially after Mamdani has come out on top in the primaries. He has been one of the key voices addressing the ethnic cleansing with its true moniker of a genocide. At the same time, he has maintained a good relationship with the Jewish population of New York, even being backed by “Jewish New Yorkers for Peace.”
In a country in which the consensus among politicians is that the conflict is “complicated,” a voice that assesses the situation for what it is might be the change we need. Beyond just this issue, Mamdani is gaining support for his rent control, public transport, and city-owned grocery store policies.
Do not get it twisted. These are Socialist policies, but they are not scary policies. The media and many establishment politicians have critiqued them for being good on paper but not realistic. Of course, we can’t say for sure that this will all come to fruition, but the plan that Mamdani lays out is quite strong.
Taxing millionaires and big corporations is a working-class dream. As we’ve seen across the country, even in Republican areas, people are tired of the 1% hoarding their wealth that they will never be able to entirely spend. This isn’t a baseless claim, either. Senator Bernie Sanders — who paved the way for this generation’s Democratic Socialist s— has been making waves across the country in his “fight against oligarchy” tour.
On the YouTube channel “More Perfect Union”, Sanders was followed around West Virginia as he interacted with the mostly Republican population. The reaction was astounding; the same problems that Mamdani is trying to address in New York are found all over the U.S. Billionaire tax breaks, health care, and child care, all in the heart of Trump country.
Simply raising the taxes on corporations to the same level as that in New Jersey, and putting a 2% tax on every dollar beyond that of a million would be fund many of the policies that Mamdani advocates. The argument here is that it would push corporations out of the city.
In Cornell University Professor Cristobal Young’s book “The Myth of Millionaire Tax Flight: How Place Still Matters for the Rich,” this myth is largely debunked, finding that just .3% of millionaires who do end up moving (which is an astounding 2.4%) do not find themselves in a lower-taxed state.
These types of policies aren’t unpopular; they’re just demonized by the most elite of businessmen and politicians. The clearest sign of the policies not being unpopular is the fact that Mamdani did indeed win the Democratic primaries. Establishment Democrats are scrambling to cope with this. Cuomo and former mayor Eric Adams are both now running as independents against the nominee with a pathetic imitation of Mamdani’s campaign.
They cannot seem to catch on like Mamdani is, and why is this? People do not trust Cuomo or Adams. With Cuomo’s previously mentioned controversy and Adams’ history of bribery allegations, these are not politicians who are known to be trusted. Adversaries of Mamdani say that these two candidates are “more experienced,” but the question is, what are they more experienced with?
Cuomo is shown to not be able to understand the word “no” not just from his sexual harassment scandals, but from his inability to back down when he loses an election. He fumbled the COVID-19 pandemic, understating the amount of nursing home deaths by a whopping 50%, and then using state funds to write a book about how great he handled the situation.
Adams, on the other hand, has been shown to be an incompetent and untrustworthy candidate. In 2024 the mayor found himself indicted on five corruption charges, which would be later dismissed by Trump’s Justice Department. This corruption ended in the resignation of multiple federal prosecutors who had taken on the case.
The Republican nominee, Curtis Sliwa, has little chance of making any real headway in this race — albeit more than Adams. Probably the most absurd out of the candidates, he wears a red beret and insists that putting feral cats in rat infested areas is the solution to the pest problem. Of course, there’s more to him but those two peculiarities sum up the substance of his campaign.
Due to there being four main candidates, the vote may be more split then we’ve ever seen in the city, but frequent polls show Mamdani dominating the field. It seems he represents everything we’ve lost in this country and much we’ve dreamed of.
A government that provides. Not a copy-paste centrist who provides marginal benefits to the working class, while giving the rich more tax cuts. Not a faux-populist who takes advantage of the working class to jumpstart an authoritarian regime. Zohran Mamdani isn’t just the future of New York, he’s the future of America.
While the old guard dies off, remaining more loyal to AIPAC than American people, Mamdani pushes the left forward. He provides a framework for which the new left can emerge. With Governor Hochul’s support it’s clear that Democratic Socialism is going to be a consistent voice in politics. The only question now is if it can get nationwide working class voter support.
Editor’s Note: For an alternate take on this year’s election, check out Parker Vibbert’s column tomorrow.
Principles of Human Services teacher Kyle Keplinger hands out assignments to his seventh-hour students. Photo by Ayianna Maddox.
by Ayianna Maddox
When someone says that they work in Human Services, the automatic thought is Child Protective Services (CPS) or counseling. But, CPS and counseling are only fractions of Human Services. What other fractions make up the whole pie?
“It’s not just counseling mental health; there are a lot of different avenues people can go down. We need each of those services, from cosmetology to police officers and firefighters. It’s all the necessities for day-to-day life,” Human Services teacher Kyle Keplinger stated.
In a way, people in the human services business sacrifice their lives every day. Firefighters fight fires, police officers fight crime, and assist in cases that involve abuse.
Psychologists and therapists put their needs aside to help guide their clients into a better lifestyle. These titles have quite a lot in common, but the most important fact is that they all selflessly put their lives on pause to aid other people.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “firefighters sleep, eat, and perform other duties during shifts that often last 24 hours.”
For psychologists, “Psychologists can expect to work 35-40 hours a week, usually Monday-Friday, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. However, they can do more or fewer hours depending on their role,” CPD Online College reports.
As children, we view these people as invincible or immortal. But we have to remember that they are just like us, human. Humans are mortal, emotional, and forces to be reckoned with, but our idols have families and friends too. Putting their lives on the line, knowing they could alter their fate differently each day, to protect others, is an act done out of selflessness and valor.
“It can be emotionally taxing, but it can be a very rewarding career. The reward far outweighs any of the negatives,” Keplinger said contentedly.
Human Services poses as an opportunity to create lasting bonds and carry them throughout life. As life progresses, there will be multiple job interviews, multiple opportunities, but with different backgrounds. Who knows, your future employer could be a life you’ve changed in the past.
In Philip K. Dick’s 1956 novelette “Minority Report” a group of psychics is used by the police department to predict future crimes.
In J.R.R. In Tolkien’s classic “Lord of The Rings” the palantir stone is the magical crystal ball which allows the user to spy on others from distances.
In our world Peter Thiel is the billionaire trying to bring these concepts from fiction to reality and it is anything but utopian.
Thiel founded the company “Palantir,” whose namesake is an on-the-nose reference to the fictional item. The function of the company is simple: Provide AI-powered software platforms to help organizations manage data sets.
But these organizations aren’t the local computer store, and these data sets aren’t just any type of information. They are providing the systems that governments use to predict citizen crimes. They are the authors of an ai used to automate drone strikes. The United States, Israel, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, India, Canada, and Spain all have government contracts with this company.
The entire shadow of our internet presence is to be collected and used against us. You may call it a surveillance conspiracy; they will call it marketing; and this is the problem with unchecked corporations. The U.S. government on our half has surrendered the information of Americans to Palantir and in exchange for what? We must ask ourselves , exactly who is this benefiting?
To understand who this benefits we must understand Peter Thiel, the Infamous billionaire who’s claimed “Freedom and Democracy are not compatible” and who has a passing interest in blood transfusions for eternal life.
In a now viral interview with the CEO, he was asked the simple question: “Should humanity endure?” His answer to this was a vomit of stuttering and a plethora of pseudo-intellectual “Well, what do you mean by that” statements.
Should we trust someone who can’t answer this question simply? Especially with the entire nation’s information?
Current Vice President JD Vance thinks so. Vance had worked in Thiel’s venture capital firm and had 15 million dollars of his Senate campaign funded by Thiel. So whose interests does Vance really have at heart? Well, if we take the so-called “Philosopher behind JD Vance” Curtis Yarvin’s word for it, his interests lie in monarchy.
Yarvin and the as well infamous British Philosopher Nick Land spearheaded “The Dark Enlightenment” movement. An ideology built out of an accelerationist view of the future. That democracy is dead and we must have a CEO monarch take hold of society. This belief also posits that humanity in fact will not endure and AI will create a singularity that we will not be able to come back from.
This may seem like something right out of another Philip K Dick novel but this is our current reality. We must not forgo our democracy to authoritarian lunatics. Palantir’s use of AI under these circumstances is even more alarming. While Thiel might not admit AI is bringing about the end of humanity, OpenAI (ChatGPT) CEO Sam Altman is, openly stating: “AI will probably most likely lead to the end of the world, but in the meantime, there’ll be great companies.”
Prioritizing company and corporation over the survival of humanity is the goal of these people. They are not populists. They’re no longer neoliberals. These are radical monarchists who are ushering in an era of dying democracy. This is the New Right.
But we must remember AI is not sentient, omnipresent, nor metaphysical. It lies in data centers. Data centers which could be torn down and replaced with almost anything better. With Microsoft recently investing 1 billion into datacenters in Indiana, the chance to counter is closer than ever. It isn’t over once they’ve built them as long as we have the strength to fight, to protest, and to speak. These democratic ideals are what they intend on taking from us and no one person living in this country should stand for it any longer.
A sort of dark nihilism has gripped the youth of this country. You know them, the “that’s just the system” or the “nothing ever happens” crowd. But we have to keep in mind that this is not the end and there is no end for humanity in sight as long as we keep our democratic spirit. No longer must we relegate the decisions of infrastructure, labor rights, and civil liberties to the will of a few profit driven maniacs.
This isn’t to say we need to drive our force behind the Democrat Party; truthfully, it’s quite obvious that the Democrat Party has failed us. These are people just as disconnected from who they’re supposed to be representing. Hundreds of miles away from their home states, sitting in Washington, with the same corporations who bought the other side, buying them.
But hope is not lost. With grass roots and anti-establishment Democrats gaining traction in cities like New York and Minneapolis, the term Democratic-Socialist is something progressives are starting to warm up to. With Zohran Mamdani’s looming victory over Andrew Cuomo and Omar Fateh’s endorsement by the DFL against Jacob Frey, it’s clear there is a shift within the party’s values.
Going forward as a country we need to understand just who we’re supporting and who’s financially supporting them. We must become the free country we so often boast of being — free of tyrannical surveillance and corporate lobbyists. We cannot let them tear down our homes for their data centers. We cannot have our peace destroyed for their profit. We must stand and shout louder for every voice they silence. There is a future for us, but we are the ones who have to build it.
thehyphennews.com 