Column: David Lynch made us question the nature of life itself

by Tyler Anthony

David Lynch: 1946-2025

David Lynch’s cinematic journey stands as a beacon of astounding creativity, one that upends conventional narrative structures and delves deep into the subconscious. The legacy of Lynch is not one of straightforward storytelling but of visceral exploration — an investigation into the fragility of the human mind, the intersection of dream and reality, and the unsettling presence of evil in the most seemingly banal spaces.

Lynch’s filmography — spanning over four decades — is defined by an unwavering commitment to the surreal and the unsettling. 

“Eraserhead” (1977), Lynch’s debut feature, set the tone for his career: a nightmarish, industrial landscape full of unsettling imagery, where the line between horror and absurdity is perpetually blurred. It is a film that rejects traditional narrative coherence, instead opting for mood and atmosphere that tap into primal fears. 

From the strange, awkward, and seemingly benign characters, to the grotesque imagery of the mutant child, Lynch forces his audience to confront the unknown and the unnerving forces lurking beneath the surface of everyday life.

The television series Twin Peaks television series, which first aired in 1990, only solidified Lynch’s place in the pantheon of modern filmmakers. It blended soap opera tropes with a deep exploration of existential dread, creating a show that was as addictive as it was enigmatic. The mystery of Laura Palmer’s death was only the surface of a much deeper narrative — one that confronted ideas of duality, the nature of evil, and the loss of innocence. The surreal, dreamlike sequences of the Red Room and its iconic inhabitants, like Bob and The Arm, remain some of the most iconic and haunting images in television history.

Lynch’s films “Blue Velvet” (1986) and “Mulholland Drive” (2001) further expanded his exploration of the darkness lurking beneath the shiny surfaces of suburban and Hollywood life. 

“Blue Velvet,” in particular, exemplifies Lynch’s knack for juxtaposing beauty with horror: the image of a pristine, picturesque suburban neighborhood shattered by the sadistic Frank Booth, whose violent rampage through the American dream is both shocking and yet eerily familiar. 

“Mulholland Drive,” often regarded as Lynch’s magnum opus, continues to haunt viewers with its disjointed narrative, melding elements of noir, psychological horror, and identity exploration, all set against the glitzy but decaying backdrop of Los Angeles.

“But even more than that, Lynch’s legacy lies in his ability to make us question the nature of life itself. In an age where audience expectations for clarity and resolution often outweigh the desire for artistic exploration, Lynch stands as a defiant figure, unafraid to push the boundaries of cinema.”

Lynch’s films possess a distinctive quality of being elusive, of being part of a larger puzzle that refuses to be solved. And yet, this refusal to provide clear answers is part of his genius. His works are best appreciated not for their plot, but for the feelings and thoughts they provoke. Lynch allows us to experience the depths of human depravity and beauty simultaneously, offering no clear moral conclusions but forcing us to reckon with the complexity of human existence. His cinematic world is one of paradoxes — dreams and nightmares, love and violence, beauty and horror — all wrapped in an aesthetic that is unmistakably his own.

Lynch’s influence extends far beyond the confines of film and television. His legacy also includes his contributions to sound and music. The work of composer Angelo Badalamenti, most notably on “Twin Peaks,” became inseparable from Lynch’s aesthetic. The haunting, ethereal tones of the “Twin Peaks” theme evoke a sense of nostalgia, melancholy, and dread — three emotions that are central to Lynch’s worldview. The collaboration between Lynch and Badalamenti, which spanned several projects, gave Lynch’s world an auditory texture that deepened the emotional resonance of his visuals.

Lynch’s work “Inland Empire” was the culmination of what he had been doing in film for decades. The surreal atmosphere, the almost completely nonsensical story, and the fact it’s shot on a camcorder make it by far the weirdest thing he had done. It’s a beautiful testament to abstractions in art.

Lynch’s refusal to adhere to traditional filmmaking paradigms has cemented his status as a pioneer. His ability to manipulate time, space, and emotion in ways that defy explanation is his most significant contribution to cinema. What is often called Lynchian — a term now synonymous with his distinctive style — refers not just to the visual and auditory choices he made, but to the worldview his films communicate: one of fractured realities, psychological trauma, and the impossibility of true understanding. 

If “Inland Empire” was the culmination of Lynch’s work as a filmmaker, then “Twin Peaks: The Return” is the culmination of Lynch’s work as an artist. Everything comes together and is perfected in this limited series. Every single element that makes the art of filmmaking is perfected. The music, the writing, the visuals, the sound, and the dialogue culminate in this monumental work of art. 

His influences go far and wide. Monumental filmmakers such as Stanley Kubrick loved David Lynch. He went as far as to say “Eraserhead” was his favorite film. Underground filmmaking legends like Gregg Araki, who made the wonderful “The Doom Generation” cited “Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me” as an influence. Contemporary indie filmmakers love him such as Jane Schoenbrun, who made “I Saw The TV Glow.”

To me Lynch’s films made me realize that film was an art. It doesn’t have to just have a deep story. In fact, it doesn’t need to have a story, it can be a collection of visuals. That’s what  the power of film is. To tell a feeling through image and sound.

But even more than that, Lynch’s legacy lies in his ability to make us question the nature of life itself. In an age where audience expectations for clarity and resolution often outweigh the desire for artistic exploration, Lynch stands as a defiant figure, unafraid to push the boundaries of cinema. His films demand a particular kind of engagement — a willingness to embrace ambiguity, to sit with discomfort, and to venture into the unknown. 

In the end, David Lynch’s films aren’t about finding answers. They are about catching a dream and finding the meaning through interpretation. It’s far too often people search for direct answers. They want the explanation fed to them. Lynch is someone who stood against that and made people think about what it could all mean for themselves.

Leave a comment